Campus leadership said the decision to scrap the PE program came from a desire to fall in line with other universities. “Offering PE courses for academic credit is no longer considered to be either an appropriate or common practice in higher education,” UC Davis spokesperson Melissa Blouin told The Enterprise last year. The termination of the program caused an uproar among faculty, students and the wider community last fall. Faculty protested, students circulated an online petition that more than 5,000 people signed, the student government unanimously passed a resolution opposing the decision and California State legislators wrote to campus leaders urging them to reconsider.

Read full article [here].
by Caleb Hampton, The Davis Enterprise.

Posted: June 10th, 2021, by: admin. Categories: . Awaiting Comments.

The Legislature also proposes to spend big to free up enrollment space at public universities… Because out-of-state students pay much higher tuition, the state would pick up the tab for that lost revenue, totaling $180 million over three years. The ultimate goal is to cap out-of-state undergraduate enrollment at the three coveted campuses at 18% –– making good on a budget deal from several years ago. Lawmakers’ budget proposal also includes $67 million to add 6,200 enrollment slots across the entire UC and $81 million to add 9,400 slots at Cal State campuses. The expansion would take effect in fall 2022. They also want to spend $540 million so that college students would have to borrow less or nothing for college.

Read full article [here].
by Laurel Rosenhall, CapRadio.

Posted: June 2nd, 2021, by: admin. Categories: . Awaiting Comments.

In the early 1990s, California contributed 78 percent of the total cost per student, a number that had shrunk to 37 percent by the 2015-16 academic year… Between 2003 and 2015, the system’s debt more than tripled, from around $5 billion to around $15 billion. A common perspective, summarized by the credit-rating agency Moody’s in 2012, was that the UC could leverage its “powerful student-market position” to “compensate for state-funding cuts by raising tuition dramatically” and by “growing nonresident tuition, differentiating tuition by campus or degree, and increasing online course offerings.” And indeed, what followed were private-market solutions. But that came at the expense of equity goals.

Read full article [here].
by Laura Hamilton and Kelly Nielsen, The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Posted: June 1st, 2021, by: admin. Categories: . Awaiting Comments.

Reducing the number of out-of-state students would allow an additional 4,600 in-state freshmen a year to be admitted; close to 30 times that many California applicants were turned away this year. UC suggests that the state simply fund more California students in addition to the out-of-state students it admits, but its campuses already are overcrowded. What the state needs is a buildup of UC capacity.

Read full article [here].
by The Times Editorial Board, The Los Angeles Times.

Posted: May 28th, 2021, by: admin. Categories: . Awaiting Comments.

As the University of California faces huge demand for seats — and public outcry over massive rejections by top campuses in a record application year — state lawmakers are considering a plan to slash the share of out-of-state and international students to make room for more local residents. The state Senate has unveiled a proposal to reduce the proportion of nonresident incoming freshmen to 10% from the current systemwide average of 19% over the next decade beginning in 2022 and compensate UC for the lost income from higher out-of-state tuition.

Read full article [here].
by Teresa Watanabe, The Los Angeles Times.

Posted: May 25th, 2021, by: admin. Categories: . Awaiting Comments.

an average annual increase of a bit more than 3¼ percent does not qualify as “the largest state investment in UC history.” It doesn’t justify the “huge budget boost” trumpet blast in this LA Times headline, or the statement cosigned by UC president Drake and board chair Peréz. There are other commitments, all one time, where the main money goes to 2 things: workforce preparedness and student housing… Newsom and Biden see higher education as workforce training for economic growth. They also tie that mainly to community colleges rather than to four-year degrees. Newsom bundles his two biggest one-time programs into an aggregate with a largish headline number that must be shared by the 3 segments, and which treats the segments and their students as the same. Newsom is joining Biden in demoting four-year colleges, which is an anti-progressive trend that universities will need to fight.

Read full article [here].
by Chris Newfield, Remaking the University.

Posted: May 24th, 2021, by: admin. Categories: . Awaiting Comments.

According to the Washington Post, President Joe Biden will not include any student loan cancellation in his annual budget. While the annual budget, which is expected at the end of next week, only contains major policy plans that have already been released by the Biden administration, it’s another major setback for student loan cancellation… It’s not that Biden doesn’t support student loan cancellation; he does. However, Biden wants Congress — not the president — to enact student loan cancellation through legislation.

Read full article [here].
by Zack Friedman, Forbes.

Posted: May 21st, 2021, by: admin. Categories: . Awaiting Comments.

The University of California Board of Regents convened on May 13 to discuss a new multiyear tuition and financial aid plan that would increase tuition for students enrolling in UC schools beginning in 2022… The plan was originally proposed at the Regents’ March 2020 meeting but was tabled until the May 13, 2021 meeting due to the pandemic. The Regents will vote on this plan in their upcoming July meeting.

Read full article [here].
by Sindhu Ananthavel, The Daily Nexus.

Posted: May 19th, 2021, by: admin. Categories: . Awaiting Comments.

The entire University of California system will now refuse even to consider SAT and ACT scores submitted, a dramatic escalation from other top colleges which had merely allowed applicants to opt-out of taking them. The system cited the supposed racism of these tests. In practice, the departure from specialized tests on the part of the College Board and the entire abandonment of generically standardized tests by colleges will exacerbate the inequality of our college admissions processes. The most privileged students will always have parents ready to dress their resumes with plum internships and volunteering positions and schools keen on grade inflation. In contrast, the nation’s poorest students — especially those in schools with no funding for AP exams and with parents who rely on them for extra income — must rely on standardized testing as an objective measure of their merit to those wealthy charlatans who hide behind letters of recommendation and nonprofit gigs.

Read full article [here].
by Tiana Lowe, The Washington Examiner.

Posted: May 18th, 2021, by: admin. Categories: . Awaiting Comments.

The University of California again is weighing a plan for annual tuition increases across the system’s nine undergraduate campuses, an idea that is drawing criticism from student leaders and some members of the university’s Board of Regents. UC leaders say they need the extra funding from tuition increases because their revenue streams have not kept pace with the university’s undergraduate enrollment growth. But critics say shifting the burden to students to cover those costs is the wrong solution, especially given the state’s budget surplus and the financial hardships brought on by the coronavirus pandemic. The proposal, brought to the Board of Regents as a discussion item Thursday, would go into effect for freshmen entering the university in fall 2022.

Read full article [here].
by Michael Burke, EdSource.

Posted: May 14th, 2021, by: admin. Categories: . Awaiting Comments.